× Requests and support related to jBackend.

jbackend k2

  • agutierrez
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
10 years 4 months ago #2721 by agutierrez
jbackend k2 was created by agutierrez
Hello,

¿Is jBackend k2 plugin ended?

Thanks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 4 months ago #2722 by admin
Replied by admin on topic jbackend k2
Almost completed,
single item and list of items are 100%. I just have to complete single category and list of categories (easy). I have suspended for a couple of week to publish the hello world plugin and the sample mobile app /you can download from this site). Tomorrow I will work to finish this module and start others, so I hope to release it this week end.

Kind regards,
Luigi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 4 months ago #2800 by admin
Replied by admin on topic jbackend k2
Just released for Joomla 3:

www.selfget.com/downloads/file/34-plg-jbackend-k2-j30.html

Tomorrow I will publish the documentation and the version for Joomla 2.

Kind regards,
Luigi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • agutierrez
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
10 years 4 months ago #2811 by agutierrez
Replied by agutierrez on topic jbackend k2
wich are the features?

Is able to upload images to image field of a item?

thanks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 4 months ago - 10 years 4 months ago #2812 by admin
Replied by admin on topic jbackend k2
No,
at the moment there are the same "features" of the content module:

www.selfget.com/documentation/jbackend-joomla30/content-module-api.html

The reason is almost simple. Each function of each module should act the same way of its extension (in this case, k2). This is not so easy due to lack of internal API to call and code complexity. This requires a selection of functions to implement (usually, the most used, as example, to build a mobile app). Otherwise it would be necessary for each module the same effort required for its extension.

The image upload, as example, is a content editor feature, and is not so commonly required. But this doesn't mean it could be implemented in the next version. Is just a matter of "priorities"... hope this is clear.

Kind regards,
Luigi
Last edit: 10 years 4 months ago by admin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.144 seconds